• Call Us: 205-322-1201    Don't be victimized twice! Call today!

    • Our Attorneys
    • Newsletters
    • Visit Our Blog
    • Home
    • Links/Resources
    • Contact Us
  • Archive for the ‘Trucking Accidents’ Category

    Contributory negligence can be a harsh defense in personal injury cases!

    Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

    If the defendant in a personal injury case based on negligence can prove that the plaintiff was guilty of any negligence that contributed to the accident or his injury, then the plaintiff is barred from recovery. The negligence of the plaintiff is called “contributory negligence” and under Alabama law is a complete bar to recovery. Strict application of the contributory negligence defense can lead to very harsh results in cases where the plaintiff was only slightly negligent for a few seconds compared to a defendant who may have known for years that its product was unsafe.

    Other states have comparative negligence. If the jury finds that the plaintiff and the defendant were both negligent, the jury assigns a percentage to the plaintiff and a percentage to the defendant, and the damage verdict is reduced by the percentage assigned to the plaintiff. For example, the jury may find that the plaintiff’s negligence was 25% of the cause of the accident and that total damages are $1,000,000. The $1,000,000 verdict would be reduced by 25% so that the defendant paid the plaintiff $750,000. The result is much fairer than applying Alabama contributory negligence law and returning a verdict in favor of the defendant.

    Alabama should change its contributory negligence law and adopt comparative negligence. This would prevent jurors from having to apply contributory negligence to reach an unfair result or from having to ignore the law to reach a fairer result.

    Lloyd Gathings

    Tags: personal injury, products
    Posted in Auto Accidents, Dangerous Products, Trucking Accidents | No Comments »

    Alabama’s Unique Death Action

    Monday, July 13th, 2009

    All fifty states have statutes providing a civil action to recover money damages if a person is wrongfully killed due to the negligence or wantonness of another. However, Alabama’s wrongful death statute is unique. You cannot recover compensatory damages in a death case in Alabama, as you can in all other states.

    Compensatory damages that cannot be recovered in an Alabama death case include loss of the love and affection of a family member, loss of the deceased person’s earnings, loss of his or her services, etc. Not only can you not recover these damages, you cannot even talk to the jury about the losses that come when a close family member, often the breadwinner, is killed. A plaintiff’s lawyer in a death case in Alabama can really say very little about the deceased family member.

    The only damages that can be recovered in a death case in Alabama are punitive damages. Although the IRS has recognized that the damages really serve compensatory purposes and do not tax them as punitive damages, I still cannot tell the jury they are to be awarded for any reason other than punishment. That often leads to a very awkward situation when the decedent’s family is looking for compensation and is really not trying to punish the defendant.

    The availability of punitive damages is appropriate and very important in the situation where a pharmaceutical company has placed a drug on the market without reasonable testing or has failed to recall the drug when reports of injuries and deaths from the drug start coming in. Similarly, when a drugged or intoxicated truck driver crosses the median and plows into a family on vacation, punitive damages are more than appropriate. But in many other types of death cases, it would help if we could at least tell the jury that the punitive damages do have a compensatory aspect to them — that they aren’t just to punish.

    Lloyd Gathings

    Tags: damages, Death, injuries, truck
    Posted in Auto Accidents, Catastrophic Injury, Trucking Accidents | No Comments »

    An Elevated Highway 280: Just an Eye Sore or More Accidents?

    Monday, June 15th, 2009

    A firm was awarded a million dollar contract last week to study whether highway 280 should be elevated, i.e., essentially

    Posted in Auto Accidents, Trucking Accidents | 2 Comments »

    • gathings-group2

    • Categories

      • Auto Accidents
      • Catastrophic Injury
      • Construction Injuries
      • Consumer Fraud
      • Dangerous Products
      • Pollution/Toxic Substance Claims
      • Prescription Drugs
      • Trucking Accidents
      • Wrongful Death
    • Recent Posts

      • Winter Driving Frequently Causes Serious Accidents
      • 2004 Toyota Truck and SUV Steering Problems
      • Lawyer Television Advertising — It Belongs in the Marketplace!
      • Back to School Safety — Talk to Your Children!
      • Morgan Keegan, Auction-rate securities, Fraud?
    • Archives

      • January 2010
      • October 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
    • Subscribe

      • Log in
      • Entries RSS
      • Comments RSS
      • WordPress.org
  •  

    Events»

    Click here for Upcoming Events

    Articles»

    Click here for Articles


    Lloyd W. Gathings


    Honora M. Gathings

    Gathings Law
    2100 Third Avenue North
    Suite 900 | Birmingham, AL 35203
    Tel: 205-322-1201 | Fax: 205-322-1202

    Contact Us  |  Map To Office

  • No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The hiring of a law firm is a serious decision that should not be based on advertising alone. Please write the firm for more information.

    © 2009 Gathings Law | Disclaimer | Website design by Law Firm Marketing